Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12490] Incorrect decode of 1394 dissection as part of 1722
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2016 07:57:24 +0000

Comment # 2 on bug 12490 from
Alexis,

I'm far from an expert either but I did buy the spec.  Unfortunately it's not
so enlightening either.  Apart from the comment that 00 represents no CIP
header it does not include an example of this.  I haven't been able to find any
examples either.  I do have some sample code that reconstructs the camera data
so I am reverse engineering that at the moment to find out what should be going
on.  It certainly looks like the the data payload commences immediately after
the 1394 header without the CIP header.  I haven't yet decoded the payload
(rebuild a jpg image) but as soon as I have done that I will be able to confirm
for sure the correct dissection.  I will post an update as soon as I get the
definitive information.
(In reply to Alexis La Goutte from comment #1)
> Hi Paul,
> 
> Can you explain the "good" dissection needed ? (i no a expert on 1722
> stuff... and the spec are not available...


You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are watching all bug changes.