Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11525] correct packed tagged as ACKED UNSEEN
Date Index · Thread Index · Other Months · All Mailing Lists
Date Prev · Date Next · Thread Prev · Thread Next
From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 08:23:21 +0000

Comment # 10 on bug 11525 from 
(In reply to Pascal Quantin from comment #9)
> (In reply to Dragan from comment #8)
> > (In reply to Pascal Quantin from comment #7)
> > > (In reply to Dragan from comment #6)
> > > > (In reply to Dragan from comment #5)
> > > > > Created attachment 13871 [details]
> > > > > false positive for acked unseen
> > > > 
> > > > ples see this case, packets 62 and 61. It is analysed with latest nightlly
> > > > build
> > > 
> > > If I"m not mistaken, there is a TCP segment missing between packets 59 and
> > > 61, thus the detection: SN=23652 to 28031 were not received.
> > > That's why you get a warning in packet 61 and 62.
> > 
> > mybe, but thenj this message in packet 62 is misleading. it is strange. If I
> > open packet 62 in detail (SEQ/ACK analysys section), there is stated that
> > this is ack to packet 61
> 
> Yes this is true, and it's telling you that it's acking an unseen segment,
> which is true also.

you mean that server ACK the whole stream of data by ACKing segment in packet
61 ... but wireshark does not see whole stream?

You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are watching all bug changes.