Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11195] Buildbot crash output: fuzz-2015-05-13-19454.pcap
Date Index · Thread Index · Other Months · All Mailing Lists
Date Prev · Date Next · Thread Prev · Thread Next
From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 03:39:34 +0000

changed bug 11195


What Removed Added
Status CONFIRMED IN_PROGRESS
CC   jeff.morriss.ws@gmail.com

Comment # 1 on bug 11195 from 
 - with tree... 
** (process:8458): WARNING **: Dissector bug, protocol LDAP, in packet 7:
../../epan/proto.c:8108: failed assertion "(guint)**fields < gpa_hfinfo.len"
(Unregistered hf!)
OK
 - without tree... 
** (process:8472): WARNING **: Dissector bug, protocol LDAP, in packet 7:
../../epan/proto.c:8108: failed assertion "(guint)**fields < gpa_hfinfo.len"
(Unregistered hf!)
OK
 - without tree but with a read filter... 
** (process:8486): WARNING **: Dissector bug, protocol LDAP, in packet 7:
../../epan/proto.c:8108: failed assertion "(guint)**fields < gpa_hfinfo.len"
(Unregistered hf!)
OK


==8109== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==8109==    at 0x657E92B: proto_item_add_bitmask_tree (proto.c:8106)
==8109==    by 0x6580C22: proto_tree_add_bitmask_value_with_flags
(proto.c:8319)
==8109==    by 0x6E2B564: dissect_ldap_DirSyncFlags (ldap.cnf:788)
==8109==    by 0x6660BD0: dissect_ber_sequence (packet-ber.c:2418)
==8109==    by 0x6E298FD: dissect_ldap_DirSyncControlValue (ldap.cnf:809)
==8109==    by 0x6E298FD: dissect_DirSyncControlValue_PDU (ldap.cnf:1108)
==8109==    by 0x6564A7E: call_dissector_through_handle (packet.c:612)
==8109==    by 0x65653C4: call_dissector_work (packet.c:700)
==8109==    by 0x6565DCD: dissector_try_string (packet.c:1427)
==8109==    by 0x665FC58: call_ber_oid_callback (packet-ber.c:1113)
==8109==    by 0x6E2BA12: dissect_ldap_T_controlValue (ldap.cnf:729)
==8109==    by 0x6660BD0: dissect_ber_sequence (packet-ber.c:2418)
==8109==    by 0x6E2927A: dissect_ldap_Control (ldap.cnf:754)
==8109== 
==8109== Use of uninitialised value of size 8
==8109==    at 0x657E931: proto_item_add_bitmask_tree (proto.c:8108)
==8109==    by 0x6580C22: proto_tree_add_bitmask_value_with_flags
(proto.c:8319)
==8109==    by 0x6E2B564: dissect_ldap_DirSyncFlags (ldap.cnf:788)
==8109==    by 0x6660BD0: dissect_ber_sequence (packet-ber.c:2418)
==8109==    by 0x6E298FD: dissect_ldap_DirSyncControlValue (ldap.cnf:809)
==8109==    by 0x6E298FD: dissect_DirSyncControlValue_PDU (ldap.cnf:1108)
==8109==    by 0x6564A7E: call_dissector_through_handle (packet.c:612)
==8109==    by 0x65653C4: call_dissector_work (packet.c:700)
==8109==    by 0x6565DCD: dissector_try_string (packet.c:1427)
==8109==    by 0x665FC58: call_ber_oid_callback (packet-ber.c:1113)
==8109==    by 0x6E2BA12: dissect_ldap_T_controlValue (ldap.cnf:729)
==8109==    by 0x6660BD0: dissect_ber_sequence (packet-ber.c:2418)
==8109==    by 0x6E2927A: dissect_ldap_Control (ldap.cnf:754)
==8109== 
==8109== Use of uninitialised value of size 8
==8109==    at 0x657E95E: proto_item_add_bitmask_tree (proto.c:8108)
==8109==    by 0x6580C22: proto_tree_add_bitmask_value_with_flags
(proto.c:8319)
==8109==    by 0x6E2B564: dissect_ldap_DirSyncFlags (ldap.cnf:788)
==8109==    by 0x6660BD0: dissect_ber_sequence (packet-ber.c:2418)
==8109==    by 0x6E298FD: dissect_ldap_DirSyncControlValue (ldap.cnf:809)
==8109==    by 0x6E298FD: dissect_DirSyncControlValue_PDU (ldap.cnf:1108)
==8109==    by 0x6564A7E: call_dissector_through_handle (packet.c:612)
==8109==    by 0x65653C4: call_dissector_work (packet.c:700)
==8109==    by 0x6565DCD: dissector_try_string (packet.c:1427)
==8109==    by 0x665FC58: call_ber_oid_callback (packet-ber.c:1113)
==8109==    by 0x6E2BA12: dissect_ldap_T_controlValue (ldap.cnf:729)
==8109==    by 0x6660BD0: dissect_ber_sequence (packet-ber.c:2418)
==8109==    by 0x6E2927A: dissect_ldap_Control (ldap.cnf:754)

You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are watching all bug changes.