Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 9515] TLSV1 "Ignored Unknown Record"
Date Index · Thread Index · Other Months · All Mailing Lists
Date Prev · Date Next · Thread Prev · Thread Next
From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 23:58:00 +0000

Comment # 24 on bug 9515 from 
The only concern I can think of with that method is when doing a second pass,
the unencrypted packets (pre-starttls) might be passed to ssl incorrectly (I'm
not sure if this will happen or not, it can be checked with "tshark -2").

If this is a problem, we may need to add a 'guint32 starttls_frame' or
something to the TCP conversation data and tweak it to respect that if set.

But yes, this general approach feels cleaner to me.

You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are watching all bug changes.