Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 9607] TFShark (Terminal FileShark)
Date Index · Thread Index · Other Months · All Mailing Lists
Date Prev · Date Next · Thread Prev · Thread Next
From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 02:24:35 +0000

Comment # 40 on bug 9607 from 
In other words:

- I think we can and should do file records in the dissector code, not in some
other library. We need it in the dissectors for other reasons anyways, unless
you suggest wiretap start doing TCP reassembly :P

- I think the refactor of wiretap is unnecessary, since my current "ideal"
tfshark doesn't need to link with wiretap or filetap at all. (Wiretap *does*
need refactoring, e.g. around custom pcap-ng blocks and such, but that's a
different issue not related to this refactoring.)

You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are watching all bug changes.