Wireshark · Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 9694] New: Wireshark not listing interfaces (work around possible)

[bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Bug ID	9694
Summary	Wireshark not listing interfaces (work around possible)
Classification	Unclassified
Product	Wireshark
Version	1.10.5
Hardware	x86
OS	Mac OS X 10.4
Status	UNCONFIRMED
Severity	Normal
Priority	Low
Component	Wireshark
Assignee	bugzilla-admin@wireshark.org
Reporter	advfs_usa@yahoo.com

Build Information:
wireshark 1.10.5 (SVN Rev Unknown from unknown)

Copyright 1998-2013 Gerald Combs <gerald@wireshark.org> and contributors.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Compiled (64-bit) with GTK+ 2.24.22, with Cairo 1.12.16, with Pango 1.36.1,
with
GLib 2.38.2, with libpcap, with libz 1.2.8, without POSIX capabilities, without
libnl, with SMI 0.4.8, without c-ares, with ADNS, with Lua 5.2, without Python,
with GnuTLS 3.1.10, with Gcrypt 1.5.3, with MIT Kerberos, with GeoIP, with
PortAudio V19-devel (built Dec 31 2013 20:49:58), with AirPcap.

Running on Mac OS X 10.9.1, build 13B42 (Darwin 13.0.0), without locale, with
libpcap version 1.5.2, with libz 1.2.8, GnuTLS 3.1.10, Gcrypt 1.5.3, without
AirPcap.
      Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3615QM CPU @ 2.30GHz

Built using clang 4.2.1 Compatible Apple LLVM 5.0 (clang-500.2.79).

--
Hi,

I found a bug 8815, which seems to match, BUT it is listed as "Resolved Later"

Basically if I run Wireshark using 'sudo wireshark' no interfaces are shown.  

If I run 'sudo wireshark -i en0 ' DOES appear to work.

If I run:
>bash-3.2$ sudo tcpdump -D

I get: 

>1.en0
>2.p2p0
>3.lo0

(This is using the MacPorts wireshark package)

I attempted sudo wireshark -i any' but it only list (something like) "Any:
(null)"

thanks
James

---

      You are receiving this mail because:

• You are watching all bug changes.