Wireshark · Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 8165] Filter s1ap.eNB_UE_S1AP_ID exists with multiple cases

[bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Comment # 7 on bug 8165 from Evan Huus

(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > I suppose it might be possible to add a hidden field that would catch both
> > values, but I have no idea what it could be reasonably called nor how to get
> > asn2wrs to detect when it needs to generate such a field.
> > 
> > We can't simply merge the two, as someone very familiar with the ASN1 spec
> > might want to explicitly filter on one form or the other.
> 
> Hi,
> Merging would be OK if we could figure out how to do that, the current
> situation is a quirk of the asn2wrs script.
> Regards
> Anders

That's not my understanding? I gather that they are named differently because
one is a top-level parameter and one is a struct member, which use different
case conventions. Is it not reasonable for someone to want to filter on the
field only when it's a struct member, and not a top-level parameter? Or are the
fields actually identical in the ASN1 spec to the point that both names are
just references to the same definition despite their differing locations?

Cheers,
Evan

---

      You are receiving this mail because:

• You are watching all bug changes.