https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7639
--- Comment #81 from Anders Broman <anders.broman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2012-09-24 01:59:59 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #79)
> (In reply to comment #78)
> > Coulden't the newly added feature of adding data to the protocol calls usable
> > in this case? P2 - P4 would have to "know" that data is (to be) passed
> > But as was disscused the data structure and magic number is defined in packet.h
> > that wouldn't be a problem - would it?
> > The data part could be void* and casted to p1_data_t at the end points
> > P2 - P4 should perhaps check the magic number
> For me it's sound quite complicated, can we do it simpler?
> (don't know how, I'm just asking...)
This was how I interpreted the intended use of the new functionality.
Did I miss something? Perhaps we need a sample implementation.
Regards
Anders
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
