Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 6841] Enhance L2TP filters to include assigned IDs
Date Index · Thread Index · Other Months · All Mailing Lists
Date Prev · Date Next · Thread Prev · Thread Next
From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:41:34 -0800 (PST)
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6841

Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |jeff.morriss.ws@xxxxxxxxx
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #7 from Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-02-23 10:41:33 PST ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> akarch@xxxxxxxxx(In reply to comment #5)
> > Committed revision 41031.
> 
> Hi Anders,
> 
> Thanks for the check-in.
> 
> I see you've committed to 1.7.x (trunk).  Can this also be committed to 1.6.x
> (trunk-1.6)?

Normally only bug fixes are back-ported to the "stable" branches.  So the
question becomes: is replacing add_text()'s with add_item()'s an enhancement or
a bug?  I do like to think of add_text()'s as bugs, but I still can't convince
myself this warrants being back-ported.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.