Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 6223] HTTP traffic is mis-dissected if the server/proxy po
Date Index · Thread Index · Other Months · All Mailing Lists
Date Prev · Date Next · Thread Prev · Thread Next
From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 18:56:22 -0700 (PDT)
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6223

--- Comment #7 from Walter Benton <wbenton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-09-12 10:56:20 JST ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > If I add port 12080 as an HTTP port number, then the port number should win out
> > over a lower port number. (i.e. for standard port numbers, the lower port
> > number should win out, but for user specified port numbers, they should take
> > precedence!
> 
> I can see your point, but the routines that handle port number to dissector
> mappings have no idea if a port was hard-coded into a dissector (i.e. TCP port
> 80) or if a user specified it (i.e. TCP port 12080).

Then input a 1-bit flag to differentiate between the two.
0 = hard-coded
1 = user-input

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.