Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 3805] New: "BER Error: Unknown field in SET class:CONTEXT(
Date Index · Thread Index · Other Months · All Mailing Lists
Date Prev · Date Next · Thread Prev · Thread Next
From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 06:04:54 -0700 (PDT)
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3805

           Summary: "BER Error: Unknown field in SET class:CONTEXT(2) tag: "
                    errors in wireshark
           Product: Wireshark
           Version: 1.2.1
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: Windows XP
            Status: NEW
          Severity: Normal
          Priority: High
         Component: Wireshark
        AssignedTo: wireshark-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
        ReportedBy: manojmahakud@xxxxxxxxxxx


Build Information:
Version 1.2.1 (SVN Rev 29141)

Copyright 1998-2009 Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> and contributors.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Compiled with GTK+ 2.16.2, with GLib 2.20.3, with WinPcap (version unknown),
with libz 1.2.3, without POSIX capabilities, with libpcre 7.0, with SMI 0.4.8,
with c-ares 1.6.0, with Lua 5.1, with GnuTLS 2.8.1, with Gcrypt 1.4.4, with MIT
Kerberos, with GeoIP, with PortAudio V19-devel (built Jul 19 2009), with
AirPcap.

Running on Windows XP Service Pack 3, build 2600, with WinPcap version 4.1
beta5
(packet.dll version 4.1.0.1452), based on libpcap version 1.0.0, GnuTLS 2.8.1,
Gcrypt 1.4.4, without AirPcap.

Built using Microsoft Visual C++ 9.0 build 30729
--
 Hi ,

  In an ANSI MAP call .
  Under the ANSI MAP section , I am getting the following error :

  [..]
              BER Error: Unknown field in SET class:CONTEXT(2) tag:16291
                [Expert Info (Warn/Malformed): BER Error: Unknown field in SET]
                    [Message: BER Error: Unknown field in SET]
                    [Severity level: Warn]
                    [Group: Malformed]

  [..]


  I have attached the full snoop trace for your review.
  You can see the packets 41 and 105 is having this issue with different tag
values.

  I have attached the text version of those packets as well.


  Please let me know if you need more information.

  Thanks & Regards
  Manoj


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.