Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 2971] Add new Bssap dissectors for the Lb interface
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2971
--- Comment #9 from Anders Broman <anders.broman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-22 01:16:28 PDT ---
Hi,
I am updating the existing packet-bsslap.c, I'm changing it to use the
same coding style as packet-gsm_a_common.x and friends to be able to
use IE decoding from that group of dissectors. From your trace it looks
like some of the stuff should be decoded by packet-gsm_a_bssmap as well.
I think your dissector for BSS MAP-LE should be called packet-gsm_a_bssmap_le
and use the same way of decoding IE's as the rest of the GSM dissectors.
I'll try to check in what I have done today or tomorrow so you can see
what it looks like.
>I noticed
>significant differences between the encode/decode for BSSMAP between the two
>interfaces, even though the IE names are exactly the same. So I think
>packet-gsm_a_bssmap.c and packet-lb_bssmap_le.c need to stay separate.
Do you have an example?
One question in the provided trace frame 2 gets decoded by packet-gsm_a_bsslap,
frame 3 by packet-gsm_a_bssmap. Can you provide a trace that should be
dissected
by a new packet-gsm_a_bssmap_le?
Regards
Anders
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
