Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 2226] Mismatching </proto> element in a PDML explort
http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2226
Martin Mathieson <martin.mathieson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #18 from Martin Mathieson <martin.mathieson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-02-07 11:52:08 GMT ---
>
> I think the not well-formed xml is solved with the newer build versions.
> There I havent found any problems with that.
That's not what you seemed to be saying earlier. I was expecting you'd post
your capture file showing a different problem...
> The only problem I have left is about the validation of this output format.
> May be you will find a way (or not) of solving this problem.
> I'm realizing that standards, that are created by somebody, will not be
> transformed 1:1 in practice... ;-)
>
I checked in the fake-protocol-wrapper thing in revision 24281. It works for
the files I've tried (TCP packets and the ARP item I mentioned). I haven't
tried validating it with the posted DTD file, but it looks OK in my editor and
in Firefox.
Standards will only be maintained if someone uses and relies upon them. Then
they will notice when it breaks and report or fix it.
Hope this helps you.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
