Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 1787] packet-bfd.c display filter field problems
http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1787
------- Comment #5 from christopher.maynard@xxxxxxxxx 2007-11-27 21:12 GMT -------
One curious thing I noticed though. With the display filter field abbreviation
change of bfdcontrol to bfd, we now have a few duplicate display filter field
names. For example, there are now two:
bfd.flags.p
bfd.flags.f
Should the two previous bfdcontrol.flags.p and bfdcontrol.flags.f be renamed to
bfd.control.flags.p and bfd.control.flags.f to avoid the conflict? Perhaps
some of the others should be renamed to bfd.control.x as well? I don't know
anything about this protocol to make any decision as to how best to resolve
this, merely reporting it. ;)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
