Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 1833] New: Dissector for srvloc protocol (SLP) does not di
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 03:39:00 +0000 (GMT)
http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1833

           Summary: Dissector for srvloc protocol (SLP) does not display
                    attribute-list correctly
           Product: Wireshark
           Version: 0.99.6
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Windows XP
            Status: NEW
          Severity: Minor
          Priority: Low
         Component: Wireshark
        AssignedTo: wireshark-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
        ReportedBy: bill.florac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Build Information:
Version 0.99.6a

Copyright 1998-2007 Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> and contributors.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Compiled with GTK+ 2.10.12, with GLib 2.12.12, with WinPcap (version unknown),
with libz 1.2.3, with libpcre 6.4, with Net-SNMP 5.4, with ADNS, with Lua 5.1,
with GnuTLS 1.6.1, with Gcrypt 1.2.3, with MIT Kerberos, with PortAudio
PortAudio V19-devel, with AirPcap.

Running on Windows XP Service Pack 2, build 2600, with WinPcap version 3.1
(packet.dll version 3, 1, 0, 27), based on libpcap version 0.9[.x], without
AirPcap.

Built using Microsoft Visual C++ 6.0

Wireshark is Open Source Software released under the GNU General Public
License.

Check the man page and http://www.wireshark.org for more information.
--
The displaying of attribute-lists in an "Attribute Reply" (ATTRRPLY) seems to
be written to display some special non-conforming attributes.  Conforming
attributes are either displayed wrong or not displayed at all.

When displaying an attributes-list in a "Service Registration" (SRVREG), the
attribute list is only displayed as a single string (and usually truncated).
While this is not wrong, it should be broken up into the comma separated
attributes as "Attribute Requests" tries to do.

Example: (of wrong display)
Service Location Protocol
    Version: 2
    Function: Attribute Reply (7)
    Packet Length: 265
    Flags: 0x0000
        0... .... .... .... = Overflow: Message will fit in a datagram
        .0.. .... .... .... = Fresh Registration: Not a new Service
Registration
        ..0. .... .... .... = Multicast requested: Not multicast or broadcast
    Next Extension Offset: 0
    XID: 7
    Lang Tag Len: 2
    Lang Tag: en
    Error Code: No Error (0)
    Attribute List Length: 244
    Attribute List: cid
    Item 1
        Service Type: IPX
        Communication Type: Unknown
        Protocol: Unknown
        Network: C044-440
        Node: 6-8386-4FF43
        Socket: 2902
    Item 2...

Example of what display should (might) look like:
Service Location Protocol
    Version: 2
    Function: Attribute Reply (7)
    Packet Length: 265
    Flags: 0x0000
        0... .... .... .... = Overflow: Message will fit in a datagram
        .0.. .... .... .... = Fresh Registration: Not a new Service
Registration
        ..0. .... .... .... = Multicast requested: Not multicast or broadcast
    Next Extension Offset: 0
    XID: 7
    Lang Tag Len: 2
    Lang Tag: en
    Error Code: No Error (0)
    Attribute List Length: 244
    Attribute List [truncated]:
(cid=687742F1-C044-4406-8386-4FF432902FF6),(acn-fctn=ETC AED),(acn-uacn=Unit
X),(acn-services=esta.dmp),(csl-esta.dmp=esta.sdt/192.168.1.103:5568;esta.dmp/c:ED3FB528-5D29-4C82-A371-D2561043BF17),(device-descript
        Item 1: (cid=687742F1-C044-4406-8386-4FF432902FF6)
        Item 2: (acn-fctn=ETC AED)
        Item 3: (acn-uacn=Unit X)
        Item 4: (acn-services=esta.dmp)
        Item 5:
(csl-esta.dmp=esta.sdt/192.168.1.103:5568;esta.dmp/c:ED3FB528-5D29-4C82-A371-D2561043BF17)
        Item 6: (device-description=$:tftp://192.168.1.103/$.ddl)
    Attr Auths: 0


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.