Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 1696] New: dfilter-test.py reports failures for ntp.precis
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 14:38:39 +0000 (GMT)
http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1696 Summary: dfilter-test.py reports failures for ntp.precision tests on 64bit Product: Wireshark Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: Minor Priority: Low Component: Extras AssignedTo: wireshark-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ReportedBy: kavol@xxxxxxxxx Build Information: $ /usr/sbin/tshark -v TShark 0.99.6 Copyright 1998-2007 Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> and contributors. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Compiled with GLib 2.12.11, with libpcap 0.9.5, with libz 1.2.3, with libpcre 7.0, with Net-SNMP 5.4, without ADNS, without Lua, with GnuTLS 1.4.5, with Gcrypt 1.2.4, with MIT Kerberos. Running on Linux 2.6.21-1.3228.fc7, with libpcap version 0.9.5. Built using gcc 4.1.2 20070502 (Red Hat 4.1.2-12). -- Hello, here is a part of my tools/dfilter-test.py output: *** snip *** ck_contains_1 ... OK ck_contains_2 ... OK ck_contains_3 ... OK ck_contains_4 ... OK Double tshark: "0.0626983642578125" is not a valid number. ck_eq_1 ... Got: [] FAILED tshark: "0.0626" is not a valid number. ck_eq_2 ... Got: [] FAILED tshark: "1.0626" is not a valid number. ck_gt_1 ... Got: [] FAILED tshark: "0.0626983642578125" is not a valid number. ck_gt_2 ... Got: [] FAILED tshark: "0.0026" is not a valid number. ck_gt_3 ... Got: [] FAILED tshark: "1.0626" is not a valid number. ck_ge_1 ... Got: [] FAILED tshark: "0.0626983642578125" is not a valid number. ck_ge_2 ... Got: [] FAILED tshark: "0.0026" is not a valid number. ck_ge_3 ... Got: [] FAILED tshark: "1.0626" is not a valid number. ck_lt_1 ... Got: [] FAILED tshark: "0.0626983642578125" is not a valid number. ck_lt_2 ... Got: [] FAILED tshark: "0.0026" is not a valid number. ck_lt_3 ... Got: [] FAILED tshark: "1.0626" is not a valid number. ck_le_1 ... Got: [] FAILED tshark: "0.0626983642578125" is not a valid number. ck_le_2 ... Got: [] FAILED tshark: "0.0026" is not a valid number. ck_le_3 ... Got: [] FAILED Integer ck_eq_1 ... OK ck_eq_2 ... OK ck_ne_1 ... OK ck_ne_2 ... OK ck_u_gt_1 ... OK ck_u_gt_2 ... OK ck_u_gt_3 ... OK ck_u_ge_1 ... OK ck_u_ge_2 ... OK ck_u_ge_3 ... OK ck_u_lt_1 ... OK ck_u_lt_2 ... OK ck_u_lt_3 ... OK ck_u_le_1 ... OK ck_u_le_2 ... OK ck_u_le_3 ... OK tshark: ntp.precision cannot accept strings as values. ck_s_gt_1 ... Got: [] FAILED tshark: ntp.precision cannot accept strings as values. ck_s_gt_2 ... Got: [] FAILED tshark: ntp.precision cannot accept strings as values. ck_s_gt_3 ... Got: [] FAILED tshark: ntp.precision cannot accept strings as values. ck_s_ge_1 ... Got: [] FAILED tshark: ntp.precision cannot accept strings as values. ck_s_ge_2 ... Got: [] FAILED tshark: ntp.precision cannot accept strings as values. ck_s_ge_3 ... Got: [] FAILED tshark: ntp.precision cannot accept strings as values. ck_s_lt_1 ... Got: [] FAILED tshark: ntp.precision cannot accept strings as values. ck_s_lt_2 ... Got: [] FAILED tshark: ntp.precision cannot accept strings as values. ck_s_lt_3 ... Got: [] FAILED tshark: ntp.precision cannot accept strings as values. ck_s_le_1 ... Got: [] FAILED tshark: ntp.precision cannot accept strings as values. ck_s_le_2 ... Got: [] FAILED tshark: ntp.precision cannot accept strings as values. ck_s_le_3 ... Got: [] FAILED ck_bool_eq_1 ... OK ck_bool_eq_2 ... OK *** snip *** It looks like the problem is somehow common to 64bit architectures; on ia64 and s390x I got those messages: *** snip *** ck_u_le_2 ... OK ck_u_le_3 ... OK ck_s_gt_1 ... Got: [] FAILED ck_s_gt_2 ... Got: [] FAILED ck_s_gt_3 ... Got: [] FAILED ck_s_ge_1 ... Got: [] FAILED ck_s_ge_2 ... Got: [] FAILED ck_s_ge_3 ... Got: [] FAILED ck_s_lt_1 ... Got: [] FAILED ck_s_lt_2 ... Got: [] FAILED ck_s_lt_3 ... Got: [] FAILED ck_s_le_1 ... Got: [] FAILED ck_s_le_2 ... Got: [] FAILED ck_s_le_3 ... Got: [] FAILED ck_bool_eq_1 ... OK ck_bool_eq_2 ... OK *** snip *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
- Prev by Date: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 1153] SSL debug file cosmetic problems
- Next by Date: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 1697] New: add heur_dissector_delete
- Previous by thread: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 1227] cmake patches
- Next by thread: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 1697] New: add heur_dissector_delete
- Index(es):