Smb2-protocol: [Smb2-protocol] Re: a first look at SMB2

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

Date Index Thread Index Other Months All Mailing Lists
Date Prev Date Next Thread Prev Thread Next
From: ronnie sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 14:29:33 +0000
I just saw that myself 10 minutes ago.


See packet 464/467    where the client binds to SRVSVC

Then packets 468/469
that are a request   carrying the SRVSVC request   and  469 is a
response that also carries payload, the SRVSVC respnse


now   the question is   what to call this opcode.


Transaction ?



On 11/24/05, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher <metze@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Stefan (metze) Metzmacher schrieb:
> > tridge@xxxxxxxxx schrieb:
> >> I thought the following might be useful for people interested in the
> >> changes in SMB2 as compared to SMB.
> >> Fewer Commands
> >> --------------
> >>
> >> The number of top level commands has been greatly reduced, and is down
> >> to 18 opcodes. Where SMB had a pile of different ways for doing
> >> something, SMB2 has just one, which is a nice change. The commands
> >> that we have found in SMB2 are
> >>
> >> NEGPROT   0x00
> >> SESSSETUP 0x01
> >> unknown   0x02
> >
> >> mount?    0x0B
> > I saw this, directly after a DCERPC bind (which was done with write/read)
> > I assume this is a call the passes data, and gets data as a result, so
> > this seems to the missing call that make rpc calls faster without out
> > the write/read overhead.
>
> btw: that was in ronnies look_at_the_acl.cap and the netshareenum2.cap
>
> --
> metze
>
> Stefan Metzmacher <metze at samba.org> www.samba.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Smb2-protocol mailing list
> Smb2-protocol@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/smb2-protocol
>

Attachment: ronnie_create_a_2000byte_file.cap
Description: Binary data