Ethereal-users: Re: [Ethereal-users] Problem: Can't get listofinterfaces: PacketGetAdapterNames:
For some strange reason, my reply from yesterday probably got lost somewhere
(I cannot see it in the archive...).
In any case...
It's definitely a WinPcap issue. Can you please report a bug as described
here:
http://www.winpcap.org/bugs.htm
?
Please be sure to use WinPcap 4.0a1 for the bug report, as the log is much
more detailed.
Have a nice day
GV
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gonze Didier" <Didier.Gonze@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Ethereal user support" <ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 6:10 AM
Subject: RE: [Ethereal-users] Problem: Can't get listofinterfaces:
PacketGetAdapterNames: There are no more files. (18)
Temporary my problem has been solved by going back to WinPcap 3.0
I think the problem is really located in WinPcap and not in Ethereal as
I've the same problem when running WinPCap tools standalone.
Still I will try with Wireshark 0.99.2
Regards,
-----Original Message-----
From: ethereal-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ethereal-users-
bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ulf Lamping
Sent: vrijdag 28 juli 2006 2:32
To: Ethereal user support
Subject: Re: [Ethereal-users] Problem: Can't get list ofinterfaces:
PacketGetAdapterNames: There are no more files. (18)
Gonze Didier wrote:
>
> Can someone help me:
>
> I am able to perform one capture with Ethereal but as soon as I try
to
> perform a second capture trough the Interface as the Options from
> Capture menu I receive the message:
>
> Can't get list of interfaces: PacketGetAdapterNames: There are no
more
> files. (18)
>
> Closing Ethereal doesn't help only reboot the PC allows me to
perform
> one new trace.
>
> I have tried with
>
> Ethereal 0.10.12 with WinPcap 3.1 beta4
>
> Ethereal 0.99.0
>
> With WinPcap 3.1, WinPCap 3.1 beta4 WinPCap 4.0 alpha1
>
> OS is Windows XP Pro.
>
First of all, you may try Wireshark 0.99.2, that's where the
development
continues.
I don't know it that'll fix your problems, however it should be the
first step to fix it :-)
Please report it on the Wireshark mailing lists, if it helped or not.
Regards, ULFL
_______________________________________________
Ethereal-users mailing list
Ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-users
_______________________________________________
Ethereal-users mailing list
Ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-users
_______________________________________________
Ethereal-users mailing list
Ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-users
