ronnie sahlberg wrote:
No this is not legal. TTCP tried to experiment long time ago with this
in order to reduce the cost of latency for small shortlived
transactions but issues were found with this approach (data inside the
syn segment) which essentially killed TTCP off.
In TCP it is not legal to transfer data in the SYN segment.
RFC 793 says:
We have taken advantage of the numbering scheme to protect certain
control information as well. This is achieved by implicitly including
some control flags in the sequence space so they can be retransmitted
and acknowledged without confusion (i.e., one and only one copy of the
control will be acted upon). Control information is not physically
carried in the segment data space. Consequently, we must adopt rules
for implicitly assigning sequence numbers to control. The SYN and FIN
are the only controls requiring this protection, and these controls
are used only at connection opening and closing. For sequence number
purposes, the SYN is considered to occur before the first actual data
octet of the segment in which it occurs, while the FIN is considered
to occur after the last actual data octet in a segment in which it
occurs. The segment length (SEG.LEN) includes both data and sequence
space occupying controls. When a SYN is present then SEG.SEQ is the
sequence number of the SYN.
Does "the SYN is considered to occur before the first actual data octet
of the segment in which it occurs" then refer only to a SYN+ACK packet,
not to an initial SYN from the connecting host?
