Ethereal-users: [Ethereal-users] Does ethereal correspond to "compact-form SIP headers" ?
Dear ethereal-users Members :
Please instruct me the specification of ethereal.
At present, I utilize ethereal for analizing SIP packets(sequences).
For the sake of extract of specific Call-Leg from 1 capture-file
including some CALL-Legs, I use "filtering conditions, sip.Call-ID..."
(ex. sip.Call-ID == jflarau1810fdajo@xxxxxxxx)
But in this way, some SIP packets(requests or responces) isn't extracted.
Then I refer to SIP headers of those packets, it is likely set "compact-form
([c:] , not [Call-ID:])"(※1).
Question.
1, Does "filtering-condition(sip.Call-ID)" not correspond to
compact-form SIP headers ?
2, For the sake of extract of specific Call-Leg, is there any ways
except for "filtering conditions, sip.Call-ID" ?
3, Does ethereal have a plan to correspond to compact-form SIP headers in the future ?
(ex. The filtering condition(sip.Call-ID) will make it possible to extract
specific Call-Leg including messages[comact-form SIP headers]... )
-----> references...
(※1) RFC3261 Compact Form
7.3.3 Compact Form
SIP provides a mechanism to represent common header field names in an
abbreviated form. This may be useful when messages would otherwise
become too large to be carried on the transport available to it
(exceeding the maximum transmission unit (MTU) when using UDP, for
example). These compact forms are defined in Section 20. A compact
form MAY be substituted for the longer form of a header field name at
any time without changing the semantics of the message. A header
field name MAY appear in both long and short forms within the same
message. Implementations MUST accept both the long and short forms
of each header name.
----->
Sincerely yours,
:-------------------
+ Kazuhiro MATSUO +
- k.matsuo@xxxxxxx -
--------------------: