Ethereal-users: RE: [Ethereal-users] incorrect tcp checksums
Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.
From: Richard Urwin <RUrwin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 16:19:35 +0100
I don't have experience of fragmentation. But I see bad IP and TCP checksums on all outgoing packets, which are immediately ack'd by the remote end. I suggest that you assume that all checksums on all outgoing packets are going to be reported wrongly. (albeit that Mads and myself are both running Win2000, and you are not. So you may very well see a somewhat different behavior.) Alternatively can you run the Sun-Fire Ethereal on a seperate machine? -- Richard Urwin, Software Design Engineer Schenck Test Automation Braemar Court, 1311b Melton Road, Syston, UK. rurwin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -----Original Message----- From: Davidson, Stuart [mailto:Stuart.Davidson@xxxxxx] Sent: 14 October 2002 16:10 To: Richard Urwin; ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [Ethereal-users] incorrect tcp checksums Just to be sure... do you mean? The checksum on the wire is actually correct but ethereal is reporting it incorrect on the outgoing side? But... On the incoming side ethereal reports the checksum incorrect until the last frame which it reports with correct checksum. The correct checksum on only the last packet on the incoming side and the immediate resumption of the tcp dialog lead me to think that the preceeding packets really do have incorrect checksums. However, I can not reconcile this with the last frame reported with incorrect checksum outgoing and correct checksum incoming. BTW. It's the same version of ethereal used on both sides on the switch, both running on Solaris 8. Any thoughts? Stuart From -----Original Message----- From: Richard Urwin [mailto:RUrwin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 8:47 AM To: Davidson, Stuart; ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [Ethereal-users] incorrect tcp checksums > 2. how can last frame have incorrect tcp checksum on server VLAN > but correct tcp checksum on client VLAN? I have found (W2000sp3) that, when capturing, the out-going checksums were always incorrect. I assumed this was due to some lower level software adding the correct checksums after Ethereal has grabbed the packet. > 1. why is the tcp checksum for a 1460 byte frame always incorrect? > 3. any ideas how to debug this further? Try looking for the upgraded drivers. If the driver is supposed to add the checksum, maybe it's doing it wrongly. -- Richard Urwin, Software Design Engineer Schenck Test Automation Braemar Court, 1311b Melton Road, Syston, UK. rurwin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -----Original Message----- From: Davidson, Stuart [mailto:Stuart.Davidson@xxxxxx] Sent: 11 October 2002 18:45 To: ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [Ethereal-users] incorrect tcp checksums We are seeing apparent tcp checksum corruption which results in retransmits and hence slow network performance. The network configuration is: Sun-Fire-280R (10.10.2.52) | 100 M/bit enet | Cisco Catalyst 3500 Series XL | 100 M/bit enet | Sun-Blade-100 (10.150.0.108) The Sun Blade is being jumpstarted from the Sun Fire hence the Sun Fire is the server and main tranmitter of tcp packets. To investigate the problem we have ethereal running on the Sun Fire and on another Sun Blade in the same VLAN as the Sun Blade. Since it's a switched network a span port is configured from the jumpstart Blade to the monitor Blade. On the server VLAN tcp checksums always appear incorrect e.g. for a 1460 byte packet the value is always 0x1caa. On the client VLAN any packets with incorrect tcp checksum results in a retransmit as expected. The following traces show a retransmit sequence. - on the server VLAN, frames 18822 - 18830 correspond to frames 17910 - 17918 on client VLAN - all frames on the server VLAN appear to have incorrect tcp checksums - note, the last frame 18830 appears to have incorrect tcp checksum on server VLAN. However, the corresponding frame 17918 on the client VLAN has the correct tcp checksum Questions: 1. why is the tcp checksum for a 1460 byte frame always incorrect? 2. how can last frame have incorrect tcp checksum on server VLAN but correct tcp checksum on client VLAN? 3. any ideas how to debug this further? Thanks, Stuart Environment: Solaris 5.8, ethereal 0.8.19 compiled GTK+ 1.2.10, Glib 1.2.10, libpcap 0.6, libz 1.1.3, UCD SNMP 4.2.1 Note, although time is not sync'd between the client and server, the delta time between the packets is the same indicating that frames 18822 - 18830 and 17910 - 17918 do correspond. <<js_cli.txt>> <<js_srv.txt>> ________________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com ________________________________________________________________________
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Ethereal-users] incorrect tcp checksums
- From: Michael Tuexen
- Re: [Ethereal-users] incorrect tcp checksums
- Prev by Date: RE: [Ethereal-users] incorrect tcp checksums
- Next by Date: Re: [Ethereal-users] incorrect tcp checksums
- Previous by thread: Re: [Ethereal-users] incorrect tcp checksums
- Next by thread: Re: [Ethereal-users] incorrect tcp checksums
- Index(es):