How did you guess ;-)
Although I thought it was general. It certainly seems a good idea to me.
Arrgh! No! I mustn't praise Microsoft!
-----Original Message-----
From: M.C. van den Bovenkamp [mailto:marco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 15 November 2001 10:46
To: Richard Urwin
Cc: 'Jeeva Chelladhurai'; ethereal-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Ethereal-users] Decode as on Tethereal
Richard Urwin wrote:
> I'm sure you know what you're doing, but this just might be of interest...
> The standard implementation of the TELNET client only uses TELNET protocol
> to port 23. When instructed to use another port it uses raw TCP.
My Linux telnet doesn't. It uses Telnet protocol even if going to
another port, and I don't see a requirement in the Telnet RFC that says
you must do otherwise.
Or is this the Windows telnet client? In that case, all bets are off :-).
Regards,
Marco.
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by the
MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit
http://www.messagelabs.com/stats.asp
