OK,
xlsfonts isn't included in Exceed. Your call on "unworthy of being called an
X client".
xlsfonts |grep lucidatypewriter
gives me 32 variants, 16 medium, 16 bold, no italic
If I understand Exceed's font display, fixed is either
-misc-fixed-medium-r-semicondensed-*-13-120-75-75-c-60-iso8859-1
or
-misc-fixed-medium-r-semicondensed-*-13-100-100-100-c-60-iso8859-1
I hope it is using the latter on my 100dpi screen, but it doesn't look like
it.
I would prefer the GTK+ dialog method.
Regards,
Andrew Hood
A distributed system is one in which the failure of a computer you didn't
even know existed can render your own computer unusable. -- Leslie Lamport,
as quoted in CACM, June 1992
"Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of the Westpac Banking Corporation."
-----Original Message-----
From: Guy Harris [mailto:guy@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, August 18, 2000 9:26 AM
To: HOOD, Andy
Cc: francois.honore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ethereal-users@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ethereal-users] Demande info
> Can you run xlsfonts? It comes with XFree86 and Solaris (probably many
> others).
If it doesn't have "xlsfonts", it's unworthy of being called an X
client; he preobably has it.
> I have Exceed on my NT system, and with the display pointing at the PC:
>
> xlsfonts -fn -*-lucida-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Note that you'd have to quote the second argument if you're using the C
shell or a compatible shell, or you'll get a "No match" error (the
Bourne shell and compatibles, by default, just pass the string on if it
doesn't match any file names).
That string won't match the Lucida Typewriter fonts, though; you'd have
to do the
> xlsfonts -fn -*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
to get them - but, if you're doing that, you might as well do just
"xlsfonts".
The "fixed" to which I referred earlier is, I think, an alias for *one*
of the "-misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--*-*-*-*-c-*-iso8859-1" fonts, but I
don't know which one; the equivalent bold font's name can be found by
replacing "medium" with "bold" - one should, if one gives a "-m" flag
wiht a particular font, also give a "-b" flag with the matching bold
font.
I am sorely tempted to make the fonts Ethereal uses preferences in the
preference file - and *NOT* make them be raw naked XLFD names (it's
truly appalling the extent to which X obliges end-users to deal with
those N-component monstrosities); instead, I'd be tempted to
1) use the GTK+ font selection dialog;
2) give a subset of the name in the preferences file, sufficient
to derive the names of the normal *and* bold-face versions
(and try to make it capable of handling whatever Owen
Taylor's doing with fonts in Pango).
(But I seem to remember somebody, perhaps Graham Bloice, a while ago
suggesting that we use inverse video rathe than boldface; I also seem to
remember a patch being supplied, and perhaps even checked in, but we're
still using boldface, so perhaps I'm misremembering.)
<<application/ms-tnef>>
