Ethereal-dev: RE: [Ethereal-dev] Win32 distclean still failing
Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.
From: "Cook, Timothy" <tcook@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 12:05:37 -0400
Software Engineer new to Ethereal/WireShark coding!!!! Back in March '06 I setup an Ethereal build environment on Win 2K, with no issues. Everything built first time!!! :)) Since then, new PC, new OS (WinXP), new Ethereal build environment (setup same as before). The build environment is based on the latest code base & libraries (installed by executing "nmake -fmakefile.nmake setup"). Tried to build from the latest SVN repository (retrieve on 6/12) & ethereal-0.99.0.tar.gz, however, I received several errors during the gtk2 build (see attachment). Is the ASN1 code necessary for Ethereal to perform basic tcp captures? I commented out the ASN1 from the Makefile.nmake inorder to clean the source tree. Commands executed: nmake -fMakefile.nmake verify_tools (completed OK) nmake -fMakefile.nmake setup (completed OK) nmake -fMakefile.nmake distclean (disabled ASN1 clean) (completed OK) nmake -fMakefile.nmake all (incomplete GTK2 errors) I've checked the WIKI & other pages. I hope the fix is simple! Thanks in advance. > -----Original Message----- > From: ethereal-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:ethereal-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Maynard, Chris > Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 11:00 AM > To: wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Ethereal development > Subject: [Ethereal-dev] Win32 distclean still failing > > I recently downloaded the pre-release source for Wireshark > 0.99.1 from: > http://www.wireshark.org/download/prerelease/wireshark-0.99.1p > re1.tar.gz > .. Like always, I run "nmake -f Makefile.nmake distclean" > before attempting to compile it. As with Ethereal 0.99.0, > the clean still fails due to no asn1 directory. I reported > this before and there was some discussion about including the > asn1 directory (and possibly others) with the source tar.gz. > Here's a link to the start of the thread > discussion: > http://www.ethereal.com/lists/ethereal-dev/200604/msg00290.html. > > Also, not sure if we should report bugs/problems to both > wireshark and ethereal developer lists or is wireshark alone enough? > > - Chris > > > ----------------------------------------- > This email may contain confidential and privileged material > for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, > use, retention, distribution or disclosure by others is > strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient > (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact > the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this > message. Also, email is susceptible to data corruption, > interception, tampering, unauthorized amendment and viruses. > We only send and receive emails on the basis that we are not > liable for any such corruption, interception, tampering, > amendment or viruses or any consequence thereof. > > _______________________________________________ > Ethereal-dev mailing list > Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev > > ______________________________________________________________ > _______________ > Scanned by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by > MessageLabs. For more information please visit > http://www.ers.ibm.com > ______________________________________________________________ > _______________ > _______________________________________________ Ethereal-dev mailing list Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
- Prev by Date: [Ethereal-dev] [Patch] MEGACO dissector fails to decode observed events descriptor
- Next by Date: RE: [Ethereal-dev] Win32 distclean still failing
- Previous by thread: [Ethereal-dev] Win32 distclean still failing
- Next by thread: RE: [Ethereal-dev] Win32 distclean still failing
- Index(es):