since it is a very rarely used protocol
the worry would be for false positives.
if the dissector mistakes common protocols for this one instead.
I would be ok with its inclusion if its heuristics can be made very
very strong so the chance of a false positive is very low.
a wiki page and example traces would be looked at positively.
On 5/31/06, Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Thomas,
the files are missing the correct header. So there is not copyright
and license information. Could you add them?
The other question is about the limited usage of the protocols, since
they are used only in your demo program. Should we include them in the
distribution? What do other developers think?
Best regards
Michael
On May 31, 2006, at 12:18 PM, Thomas Dreibholz wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Attached to this mail, you find a patch adding 4 dissectors for the
> rsplib
> Open Source RSerPool implementation's test programs (see also
> http://tdrwww.iem.uni-due.de/dreibholz/rserpool/).
>
>
> Best regards
> --
> ======================================================================
> =
> Dipl.-Inform. Thomas Dreibholz
>
> University of Essen, Room ES210
> Inst. for Experimental Mathematics Ellernstraße 29
> Computer Networking Technology Group D-45326 Essen/Germany
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> E-Mail: dreibh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Homepage: http://www.exp-math.uni-essen.de/~dreibh
> ======================================================================
> =
> <rsplib.diff.gz>
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-dev mailing list
> Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
_______________________________________________
Ethereal-dev mailing list
Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
_______________________________________________
Ethereal-dev mailing list
Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
