Ethereal-dev: [Ethereal-dev] Re: rev 17485: /trunk/epan/: emem.c emem.h

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

Date Index Thread Index Other Months All Mailing Lists
Date Prev Date Next Thread Prev Thread Next
From: "ronnie sahlberg" <ronniesahlberg@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 06:22:12 +0000
ok   can you test with  the latest SVN    there are two defines in
emem.c   you should remove    WANT_GUARD_PAGES   and
DEBUG_USE_CANARIES.


comment both of them out   and pelase test how   slow it becomes.



On 3/10/06, didier <dgautheron@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
> ronnie sahlberg wrote:
> > that is very odd.    can you verify by reversing the nfs patch to see
> > that it was indeed changing to a tree that caused this slowdown?
> Both times are with svn 17537 (I think, version.pl is broken if you
> don't build in the source tree) .
> 50s with packet-tcp.c and packet-nfs.c back to hash.
> >
> > in my initial test there was no slowdown.
> >
> >
> > ill test with some more large nfs traces.
> >
> > (can you make that nfs trace available to me for testing?)
> It's a make clean; make
> with the source tree (not the build dir) nfs mounted on loopback UDP,
> NFS 3, linux 2.4.something, captured with tcpdump -i any -s 0 -w foo.pcap.
> all nfs prefs set.
> It's big :)
>
> Didier
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-dev mailing list
> Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
>