Ethereal-dev: Re: [Ethereal-dev] SCCP segmentation

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

Date Index Thread Index Other Months All Mailing Lists
Date Prev Date Next Thread Prev Thread Next
From: LEGO <luis.ontanon@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 23:13:39 +0100
I think it should not be hard to do it based of the binding_info.

Beware that if (binding == &no_binding) we do not have a binding so
you should not reassemble or else we'll have trouble.

BTW: binding is not the propper name, session or call might be better names.

Luis

On 1/18/06, Anders Broman <a.broman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm looking into it.
> Brg
> Anders
>
> Hi Olivier,
>
> you are correct, SCCP reassembly is currently not implemented.
>
> Best regards
> Michael
>
> On Jan 18, 2006, at 3:35 PM, Jacques, Olivier (OCBU-Test Infra) wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > It seems that SCCP (with TCAP payload) re-assembly (XUDTs) is not
> > supported in Ethereal.
> > Anyone already looked at it? Any thoughts?
> >
> > I have a trace I can send on demand.
> >
> > Olivier.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ethereal-dev mailing list
> > Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-dev mailing list
> Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-dev mailing list
> Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
>


--
This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself.
-- Marshall McLuhan