ronnie sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@xxxxxxxxx>, Ethereal development <ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx> schrieb am 02.08.05 19:47:22:
>
> Everyone happy with this naming convention tvb_get_ephemeral_...()
> for the allocations with packet dissection allocation lifetime?
>
> If not and someone has a better naming convention, it should really
> just be a matter of some sed magic to change it anyway.
>
Hmmm, as my english vocabulary is quite limited, ephemeral sounds to me like a place somewhere in a Tolkien novel ;-)
But I really can live with it.
What about transient?
BTW: I had a quick look at the emem.c file. It seems to allocate memory in chunks of 10MB, which might be a bit large. Is there a reason to use such a large chunk? Wouldn't be 1MB enough to prevent countless g_malloc calls? People with small capture files will loose a lot of memory unused ...
Regards, ULFL
______________________________________________________________
Verschicken Sie romantische, coole und witzige Bilder per SMS!
Jetzt bei WEB.DE FreeMail: http://f.web.de/?mc=021193
