The conformance magic for ReleaseCallArg is pretty big.
Is it possible to refactor this and specify ReleaseCallArg in the ASN
file instead?
On 4/28/05, Javier Acuña <javier.acuna@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> This patch fixes the previous bugs (the fixes I submitted a couple of days
> ago but hasn't been checked in yet) and adds support for:
>
> ReleaseCall
> ApplyChargingReport (thanks to Tim who sent me the patch for this)
>
> Best Regards
>
> Javier Acuña
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________
>
> Mensaje enviado desde el Servicio Webmail del Dominio sixbell.cl
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _____________________________
> La informacion contenida en esta transmision es confidencial, y no puede ser
> usada por otras personas que su(s) destinatario(s). El uso no autorizado de
> la informacion contenida en esta transmision puede ser sancionado. Si ha
> recibido esta transmision por error, por favor destruyala y notifique al
> remitente telefonicamente, con cobro revertido o via e-mail.
>
> The information contained in this transmission is privileged, and may not be
> used by any person other than its addressee(s). Unauthorized use of the
> information contained in this transmission may be punished by law. If
> received in error, please destroy and notify the sender by calling collect
> or by e-mail.
> _____________________________
>
