thx
ronnie sahlberg wrote:
i have checked in a change that does this by reading the values out
into a real guin32 and thus avoid the alignment problems.
I also used XOR instead of OR, which i assume you really intended
You are right.
/rene
On Wed, 06 Apr 2005 13:03:02 +0200, Pilz Rene <rene.pilz@xxxxxx> wrote:
Hi
Please take a look at this patch. It should lower the probability of
wrong reassembly. It uses now a 32bit key instead of only the 16bits of
the identification field.
/rene
**
<http://dict.tu-chemnitz.de/dings.cgi?o=3003;count=50;service=en-de;query=probability>
--
Dipl-Ing (FH) MSc. C.E René Pilz
ftw. Telekommunications Research Center Vienna http://www.ftw.at
Tech Gate Vienna, Donaucitystraße 1, A-1220 Wien
Mobile: +43 664 8269871 Office: +43 1 5052830-13 Fax: +43 1 5052830-99
_______________________________________________
Ethereal-dev mailing list
Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
--
Dipl-Ing (FH) MSc. C.E René Pilz
ftw. Telekommunications Research Center Vienna http://www.ftw.at
Tech Gate Vienna, Donaucitystraße 1, A-1220 Wien
Mobile: +43 664 8269871 Office: +43 1 5052830-13 Fax: +43 1 5052830-99
