Joerg,
It was not Mitel in manuf, I just checked in a change to set it.
That probably confused you.
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 02:29:01 +0100, Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 02:54:43PM -0500, Juan_Gonzalez@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > The attached patch corrects a manufacturer OUI. The information changed is
> > based on the latest ieee oui list.
> > (See attached file: manuf.patch)
>
> | FILE COMPARISON^M
> | Produced: 2/25/2005 2:52:08 PM^M
> | ^M
> | ^M
> | Left File: C:\Ethereal\ethereal-0.10.6\manuf Right File:
> | +C:\Ethereal\ethereal-0.10.6_NaturalConvergence\manuf^M
> | 7539c7539^M
> | < 08:00:0F Mitel # Mitel Networks^M
> | ---^M
> | > 08:00:0F SMC^M
>
> I have some problem to understand the information: Are you trying to tell
> me that 08:00:0F does not belong to Mitel but to SMC instead? According
> to the IEEE web page, this OUI belongs to Mitel:
> Source: http://standards.ieee.org/regauth/oui/oui_public.txt
> In case another source at IEEE lists this as SMC, please let me know.
>
> Thanks
> Joerg
>
> --
> Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
> works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-dev mailing list
> Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
>
--
This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself.
-- Marshall McLuhan
