Wireshark · Ethereal-dev: [Ethereal-dev] packet-x509if.c small visual correction

[Yaniv Kaul <ykaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

From packet-x509if.c:

{ &hf_x509if_RDNSequence_item,
 { "Item[##]", "x509if.RDNSequence_item",
   FT_UINT32, BASE_DEC, NULL, 0,
   "RDNSequence/_item", HFILL }},
{ &hf_x509if_RelativeDistinguishedName_item,
 { "Item(##)", "x509if.RelativeDistinguishedName_item",


Do we really need the [##] and (##) ? Do they have any special meaning? 
A new notation for  /*FIXME*/  perhaps?  ;-)

It seems that there are more places we can/should 'rename':

$ grep "\[##]" *.c
packet-cms.c:      { "Item[##]", "cms.RecipientEncryptedKeys_item",
packet-pkinit.c:      { "Item[##]", "pkinit.trustedCertifiers_item",
packet-pkix1implicit.c:      { "Item[##]", 
"pkix1implicit.noticeNumbers_item",
packet-x509af.c:      { "Item[##]", "x509af.Extensions_item",
packet-x509af.c:      { "Item[##]", "x509af.ForwardCertificationPath_item",
packet-x509af.c:      { "Item[##]", "x509af.theCACertificates_item",
packet-x509af.c:      { "Item[##]", "x509af.revokedCertificates_item",
packet-x509af.c:      { "Item[##]", "x509af.acPath_item",
packet-x509af.c:      { "Item[##]", "x509af.attributes_item",
packet-x509ce.c:      { "Item[##]", "x509ce.KeyPurposeIDs_item",
packet-x509ce.c:      { "Item[##]", "x509ce.CertificatePoliciesSyntax_item",
packet-x509ce.c:      { "Item[##]", "x509ce.policyQualifiers_item",
packet-x509ce.c:      { "Item[##]", "x509ce.PolicyMappingsSyntax_item",
packet-x509ce.c:      { "Item[##]", "x509ce.GeneralNames_item",
packet-x509ce.c:      { "Item[##]", "x509ce.AttributesSyntax_item",
packet-x509ce.c:      { "Item[##]", "x509ce.GeneralSubtrees_item",
packet-x509ce.c:      { "Item[##]", "x509ce.CRLScopeSyntax_item",
packet-x509ce.c:      { "Item[##]", "x509ce.StatusReferrals_item",
packet-x509ce.c:      { "Item[##]", "x509ce.CRLDistPointsSyntax_item",
packet-x509if.c:      { "Item[##]", "x509if.RDNSequence_item",