Ethereal-dev: Re: Re: [Ethereal-dev] [possibly bug] RUDP and user specific decodes

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

Date Index Thread Index Other Months All Mailing Lists
Date Prev Date Next Thread Prev Thread Next
From: Paul Ionescu <paul@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 20:46:01 +0300
Hi Martin,

The problem is solved. It was not an ethereal bug.
The Official Fedora Core 1 update of ethereal (10.3) has no CiscoSM
plugin compiled in.
So the RUDP was the end of dissectors.
Then, I compiled from source the ethereal 10.3, but modifying the
default port to 7007, because it was easy to do,and of course this
worked like it should.
Then I suspected that is something wrong, and I looked at the code which
was looking OK.

In short, the problem was mine (and FC1 ethereal update) and I
appologise for wasting all your time.

On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 11:16, martin.regner@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Guy Harris wrote:
> > 
> > On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 07:12:15PM +0300, Paul Ionescu wrote:
> > > For a quick hack I changed the default port from 7000 to 7007 and
> > > recompiled ethereal.
> > 
> > I.e., with "Decode As" it doesn't pass the data to Cisco SM and with the
> > dissector explicitly changed it does, even though, in both cases, it
> > dissects it as RUDP?
> > 
> > That's bizarre - the code path should be the same in both cases.  Do you
> > have a sample capture you could send us?
> > 
> 
> 
>  I looked a little on the code yesterday but couldn't undrestand why that could happen.
> There was however some mistakes in 0.10.3 version of RUDP dissector that has been fixed
> after that - but I couldn't understand why those differenecs should matter.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-dev mailing list
> Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
>