Ethereal-dev: RE: [Ethereal-dev] Portability patches

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

Date Index Thread Index Other Months All Mailing Lists
Date Prev Date Next Thread Prev Thread Next
From: "Michael Lum" <mlum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 22:00:03 -0800
Yes, my plan was that when I implement IOS 4.2 I would use
the MACRO to make sure the array is large enough to hold
the maximum number of elements.

And then I would do IOS 4.3.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Guy Harris [mailto:guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 9:56 PM
> To: Michael Lum
> Cc: ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Portability patches
> 
> 
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 07:06:58PM -0800, Michael Lum wrote:
> > For now know.
> > 
> > Later when I add the newer versions of IOS I can change it
> > to work differently.
> 
> So are you saying that, in the future, the "ANSI_A_MAX()" calls in
> question will have two arguments neither of which is 0?
> 
> If so, we might as well leave the code the way it is now (with dynamic
> allocation).