Ethereal-dev: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Has anyone seen a recent version of Etherpeek ...

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

Date Index Thread Index Other Months All Mailing Lists
Date Prev Date Next Thread Prev Thread Next
From: Jeff Morriss <morriss@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 09:35:25 -0400


Guy Harris wrote:



On Sep 22, 2003, at 12:11 AM, Richard Sharpe wrote:


It also claims:

    ASN.1, H.225, H.245, H.261, H.323, G.711, G.723, G.728,
    G.729, Q.850, Q.931, Q.932, Q.952, Q.953, Q.955, Q.956, Q.957, SAP,
    SSDP, SIP

Howe many of these are we handling so far?


[...]
I don't remember what Q.850 is, offhand; we do have a dissector for Q.931, but not the other Q. protocols (unless there's nothing to dissect, or if they're just small addenda to other protocols and we already handle those addenda). 

Looking at this thread:

http://www.ethereal.com/lists/ethereal-dev/200302/threads.html#00038


and this patch (which was checked in with some changes):

http://www.ethereal.com/lists/ethereal-dev/200302/msg00190.html


Ethereal supports Q.850--although it's not a protocol.

(Should "packet-isup.c" reference the fact that it's compliant to Q.850?)