Ethereal-dev: Re: [Ethereal-dev] New protocol WBXML

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

Date Index Thread Index Other Months All Mailing Lists
Date Prev Date Next Thread Prev Thread Next
From: Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 17:26:01 -0800
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 07:51:08PM +0100, Biot Olivier wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Please find a first attempt at WBXML content decoding. Currently only WBXML
> header decoding is supported.

Presumably you'll use the WBXML dissector handle in packet-wsp.c at some
point?

> Add packet-wbxml.c and packet-wbxml.h to Makefile.am.

...and add packet-wbxml.c to Makefile.nmake.  (An invariant to preserve
with all changes to Makefile.am or Makefile.nmake is "the contents of
the DISSECTOR_SRC macro is exactly the same in both files.")

> Please check in.

Done.

> Comments are welcome :)

According to

	http://www.ee.oulu.fi/research/ouspg/protos/testing/c05/wap-wmlc/

"WMLC is basically an encoding scheme specified by WBXML (WAP Binany XML
content format) specification."

So is it more correct to say that the WBXML dissector is dissecting
WBXML or to say that it's dissecting WMLC, or is there something other
than either of those that's the correct thing to say?