Ethereal-dev: RE: [Ethereal-dev] adding BASE_OCT?

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

Date Index Thread Index Other Months All Mailing Lists
Date Prev Date Next Thread Prev Thread Next
From: "Neulinger, Nathan R." <nneul@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 11:40:31 -0600 
It was actually already there, just didn't use the %o format - was lumped in
with %d/%u for the int/uint. I made the change for the four places it did
the format. It's not clear at this point if %o will work properly with a int
as opposed to an unsigned int though. Might want to back that part off, but
no one is actually using the octal stuff yet other than packet-afs.

-- Nathan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gilbert Ramirez [mailto:gram@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 10:01 AM
> To: Neulinger, Nathan R.
> Cc: ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Ethereal-dev] adding BASE_OCT?
> 
> 
> On Fri, 3 Nov 2000 09:45:46 -0600
> "Neulinger, Nathan R." <nneul@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Would it be reasonable to add a BASE_OCT display type?
> > 
> > -- Nathan
> 
> Yes, it would. 
> 
> --gilbert
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-dev mailing list
> Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
>